bounded by

Bounded By

So this is bounded.

A convergent sequence is bounded.

Her heart bounded with joy.

His heart bounded with expectation.

My heart bounded with joy.

We can only have bounded variables

They've bounded the city with a line.

The ball bounded away into our neighbor's garden.

Italy is bounded on the north by Switzerland.

Japan is bounded by water on every side.

These are bounded between 0 and negative 1.

They're still bounded by legal goals and principles

Oh, God, I could be bounded in a nutshell...

Upper bounded by this same number, 6N log N 6N.

When our ambition is bounded, it leads us to work joyfully.

When our fears are bounded, we're prudent, we're cautious, we're thoughtful.

The fourth one always succeeds in a bounded number of steps.

So it's 0 times something bounded between 1 and negative 1.

It's bounded on three sides by Fuller, Santa Monica and Poinsettia.

If you cannot do this after the fact, it's really not bounded.

The nice mathematical thing about discount factor is it keeps this expectation bounded.

We were bounded only by the Earth and the ocean and the sky.

That's why it's running time is bounded by a constant times N log

Therefore, the solution will be unbounded. It can't really be bounded it in advance.

The Sargasso Sea, for example, is not a sea bounded by coastlines, but it is bounded by oceanic currents that contain and envelope this wealth of sargassum that grows and aggregates there.

We've now shown that for each value of n, T(n) is always upper bounded by 4n.

One is it always reaches the goal state and does so in a bounded number of steps.

That is, a solution that is guaranteed to reach the goal in a bounded, finite number of steps.

By bounded I mean in advance you can tell me a maximum number of steps not after the fact.

The second possibility is always reaches the goal state, but the number of steps cannot be bounded in advance.

Then I also want you to answer what does it take to guarantee that we have a bounded solution?

It means eventually, for all sufficiently large values of n, it's bounded above by a constant multiple of f(n).

So how do we say, in mathematics, that eventually it should be bounded above by a constant multiple of f(n)?

The final plan SA, AD, DG avoids all the floods and the stoplight and will therefore always succeed in 3 steps, which is bounded.

Formally, we define a probability function to be P(X), and it's a value that is bounded below and above by 0 and 1.

T(n 2) we're assuming is upper bounded by 4n 2, which is 2n, and this quantity T(n) we're assuming is less than 4n.

In bounded rationality you try to satisfy, so you have a threshold that says if the decision is good, I'm just going to implement the decision.

So, the length of every root null path, the minimum length of every root null path is bounded above by log base two of quantity N 1.

One is that every region in a planar graph has to be encapsulated has to be bounded by at least three edges for it to be a region.

We first upper bounded it by 4m plus two, for an array of length m, and then we said, eh, let's just think about it as 6m instead.

We can make it slightly less of a mess if we notice that this is upper bounded by 4 times the rounded down logarithm of a plus 7.

In fact, there's some cases very good algorithms and you see that they're all polynomially bounded, so there's some polynomial in n and m that actually is larger asymptotically than all of these.

I pictured him sitting in his lonely studio with no company but his bitter thoughts, and the pathos of it got me to such an extent that I bounded straight into a taxi and told the driver to go all out for the studio.