Zambian woman economist.

My employer an economist.

And so, asks The Economist

I'm not an economist myself.

The economist anticipated a prolonged depression.

I'm an economist. I do dismal.

There's an economist named Edward Castronova.

I'm an economist. I do dismal.

An economist would never do that.

The economist instinctively anticipated the current depression.

And he's an economist, so he's rational.

And this is named after the economist Pareto.

I went to university to become an economist.

We received commentary in Discover magazine, in The Economist.

The man you are working for is not an economist.

An economist says, essentially, more for you is less for me.

Well resisting temptation is hard, as the 19th century English economist

Richard Jones became an important economist who later influenced Karl Marx.

We can get this information from the Internet, from The Economist,

This led me, as a behavioral economist, to an intriguing hypothesis.

Even though I'm an economist, I find that a pretty large error.

And he says, no you silly, how can you be an economist?

Justus Wittich As an economist, I can calculate that it is possible.

So here's an article that it wrote, about an extraordinary macro economist,

Just 10 years ago, if you had gone to an economist, anywhere,

You were a free market capitalist economist or you were a Keynesian liberal economist, and these people didn't go to each other's weddings, they snubbed each other at conferences.

And one economist says, hey, why don't I pick up the 20 bill.

It's kind of a metric that nobody would think of except an economist.

An economist is a man who states the obvious in terms of the incomprehensible.

So a standard economist, somebody who believes in rationality, would say, You know what?

You can see Honey, very good market economist, goes with the guy who gives more.

So a rational choice economist would say, well, you should take all non zero offers.

You can take a Harvard educated Ivy League economist, stick him in charge of Argentina.

But again, as an economist, I'm thinking about life on the margin, the extra decision.

To do that I'm going to talk about my research as an economist on the epidemic.

The Economist wrote an article about it, and lots of people have blogged about it tremendous frustration.

I think the gang member says it much more articulately than the economist, about what's going on.

I mean, I'm an economist, but this is ultimately not an economic question, it's a moral question

And he really is kind of the first real economist in the way that we view it now.

An economist is an expert know will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today.

So I decided to do the experiment that I would have loved The Economist to do with me.

I'm not an economist, very much not, but I did, quite literally, a back of the envelope calculation (Laughter)

He's an Austrian school economist who was first active in the first half of the 20th century in Vienna.

But then along came a lowly economist, who had children himself, and he used the expensive and complicated treatment.

Another notable economist, Theodore Schultz, in 1974 won the Nobel prize for demonstrating that farmers are efficient, but poor.