And they have thereof no knowledge. They follow not except assumption, and indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.

An assumption and only an assumption.

And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allah is Knowing of what they do.

Seems the logical assumption.

And they do not have any knowledge of it they just follow assumption and indeed assumption does not serve any purpose in place of the Truth.

More data? Making the Markov assumption rather than naive Bayes assumption?

What about the second assumption?

The assumption is something like this.

Would it be helpful to make a Markov assumption rather than the naive Bayes assumption?

That's just an assumption.

It's all assumption driven.

The basic law, let's say here's an assumption.

They're making some assumption about the discount rates.

And this risk free is the big assumption.

The discount rate assumption is everything in finance.

We can make the Markov assumption and that's the assumption that the effect of one variable on another will be local.

That's a big assumption, and we could test whether or not that assumption is valid.

And this is a huge assumption.

It's a reasonable assumption I think.

That's why this assumption is important.

That's one hell of an assumption.

But that assumption was a problem.

Perhaps it was just an assumption.

The financial system is built on the assumption of growth

It's extremely unlikely given the assumption that everybody's healthy.

Well, follow the money. Or, follow the phone bill.

Follow the sun

Follow the light.

Follow the trail.

Follow the trail.

Follow the bloodhound.

Follow the crowds.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

She put on an assumption of ignorance.

What he said bears out my assumption.

And finally there's this assumption of homoskedasticity.

Next assumption and of course the events of July 7,

This is under the assumption that there's no parallel arcs.

In this case, the problem really comes down to the naive Bayes assumption is a weak one, and the Markov assumption would do much better.

And most of them do not follow anything except assumptions indeed assumption does not serve the least purpose (in place) of the truth indeed Allah knows their deeds.

Indeed all those in the heavens and all those in the earth are in Allah s control and what do those who pray to the partners instead of Allah, follow? They do not follow anything except assumption, and they only make guesses.

Unquestionably, to Allah belongs whoever is in the heavens and whoever is on the earth. And those who invoke other than Allah do not actually follow His partners. They follow not except assumption, and they are not but falsifying

I'll follow the rats.

They follow the characters.

Just follow the chain.