We have this gene defect in our mind.

Before you fix the defect, you should be sure that the defect actually is the defect.

First, we have the defect and then we have the failure.

More specifically, whatever a module imported would determine its likelihood to have a defect.

He has a defect in his character.

You should have a clear understanding about how your correction fixes the defect.

So I'm to defect?

Carelessness was looked on as a serious defect.

A defect, however, is somewhere in the code.

Your defect is a propensity to hate everyone.

She had a spina bifida defect, a spinal cord abnormality.

There is such a thing as a defect in a story.

There must be a defect in the experimental method.

Remove the defect of my tongue

A quick temper is the only defect in her character.

Finally, every defect can cause a failure. How? That's tricky.

To start with, not every defect automatically causes a failure.

We also want to make sure that the defect causes the failure if A is the defect and B is the failure.

Why would men who have the mutation a defect in an antiviral defense system get prostate cancer?

I don't just mean a logical defect. I mean a bad explanation.

You can execute a program again and again, never have a failure and still have a defect in there, however, if a program fails, that is if we actually see a failure, then we can always trace it back to the defect that causes it.

Ventricular Septal (septal just means wall) Defect.

Which of the following is not true every infection can be traced back to a defect that causes it, every execution of a defect causes an infection, every infection ends in a failure, and finally, every defect can cause a failure up to you.

To be perfect she lacked just one defect.

Tut!' and I'll apologize and remedy the defect.

An inner defect never fails to express itself outwardly.

Well first and foremost, this is a defect because if a statement produces an infection then it must be erroneous itself, and an error in the code is what we normally call a defect.

Second, every execution of a defect causes an infection. That's actually not the case.

The defect is what turns otherwise valid input in the end into a failure.

So let me assume that this statement we're executing here actually has a defect.

But all this is only a detail next to the principal defect of the game.

That can't be happening. Paula will get a defect, if this goes on much longer.

And these are the two things we need to show when we fix a defect.

Errors are typically unwanted and unintended. Failures are error. A defect is also an error.

So all we need in this situation is to look at the governing condition, and lo and behold, we do have a defect.

An Arabic Quran, without any defect, so they may become righteous.

What defect can you find in the present system of education?

Now, however, since in the beginning, we have a normal input and in the end we have a failure, there must be a defect somewhere in our program that actually causes the problem.

In one of the joints between over 9,000 magnets in LHC, there was a manufacturing defect.

First, every infection can be traced back to defect that causes it.

If only it were so, then it would be far easier to make a program defect free.

What we do not get is the location of the defect in the code because the defect would actually causes the infection that later causes the assertion to fail, maybe in a completely different location.

In reality, we have 10,000 of such variables and not only do we have 10,000 of such variables, we also have 10,000 of steps between defect and failure.

In order to make sure that the defect is an error, we must show how to correct it and to show that the defect causes the failure, we must show that the failure no longer occurs after we have changed it.

If it were not for this defect, I should hire him at once.