What he said bears out my assumption.

An assumption and only an assumption.

More data? Making the Markov assumption rather than naive Bayes assumption?

That's just an assumption.

It's all assumption driven.

Seems the logical assumption.

What about the second assumption?

That's a big assumption, and we could test whether or not that assumption is valid.

Would it be helpful to make a Markov assumption rather than the naive Bayes assumption?

And this is a huge assumption.

It's a reasonable assumption I think.

That's why this assumption is important.

That's one hell of an assumption.

But that assumption was a problem.

The assumption is something like this.

Perhaps it was just an assumption.

She put on an assumption of ignorance.

And finally there's this assumption of homoskedasticity.

The basic law, let's say here's an assumption.

I'm not at all comfortable with that assumption.

They're making some assumption about the discount rates.

And this risk free is the big assumption.

The discount rate assumption is everything in finance.

I think six martinis is a reasonable assumption.

That's a hell of an assumption to make...

We'll do other videos where we talk about when it is a good assumption, when it isn't a good assumption.

And they have thereof no knowledge. They follow not except assumption, and indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

We can make the Markov assumption and that's the assumption that the effect of one variable on another will be local.

So we just took your assumption, divided by 12.

It's extremely unlikely given the assumption that everybody's healthy.

How would we detect a violation of that assumption?

Next assumption and of course the events of July 7,

So that's what statisticians would call an assumption of independence.

So we can't make any attempt of assumption like that.

This is under the assumption that there's no parallel arcs.

Let's test this assumption by heading over to Eastern Europe.

The financial system is built on the assumption of growth

And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allah is Knowing of what they do.

In this case, the problem really comes down to the naive Bayes assumption is a weak one, and the Markov assumption would do much better.

So this is the assumption that you get in on that.

This is a feasible goal, basically because, contrary to widespread assumption,

This brings me to the third, and perhaps most problematic, assumption

And the assumption is that they're related like cousins or whatever.

And that additional assumption would have to be probabilistic in nature.