Last in Europe GDP per capita.

Country A has surpassed Country B with 700 per capita GDP as compared with 650 per capita GDP.

That's not U.S. GDP per capita, which will be over a million, but world GDP per capita 200,000.

It's basically two ratios of per capita GDP, per capita gross domestic product, so average income.

And this is GDP per capita on this axis.

Here is GDP per capita from 1900 to 1929.

Country A, in 1990, had about 300 per capita GDP as compared with Country B, which had 460 in per capita GDP.

So it'll show you GDP per capita, population, longevity, that's about it.

less energy per capita.

Even at that rate, by 2100 average GDP per capita in the world will be 200,000.

We're the saddest place on Earth, relative to GDP per capita the saddest place on Earth.

China out perfomed India in terms of GDP growth by an average of about 2.2 percent every year in terms of per capita GDP.

Here it is, which says that the bigger you are the more you have per capita, unlike biology higher wages, more super creative people per capita as you get bigger, more patents per capita, more crime per capita.

Carbon dioxide emission, metric ton per capita.

From now on we count per capita.

We were having negative per capita growth.

In 2010, right before the revolution, even though GDP per capita had been growing at five percent for several years,

But from now on, we count per capita.

So here's GDP per person in America.

Per capita food production is up by a third.

And everyone is responsible for the per capita emission.

The size of the blob in this graph represents the size of the population, and the level of the graph represents GDP per capita.

Five percentage points of your GDP saved per year.

Less petrol stations per capita the bigger you are not surprising.

The per capita average in Africa, India, China, Japan, EU, Russia.

This is the GDP per capita. And it's a new technology coming in, but then amazingly, how well it fits to the economy of the countries.

A hundred dollars per capita, per person, is something that any state government can afford to do.

You know, Americans use seven times the CO2 per capita as Chinese.

And these are countries from United States here, with 40,000 per capita,

Well we've shown you that GNP per capita doesn't make any difference.

I'm not sure how to do that or reducing per capita consumption.

And China was emitting 0.6, and India was emitting 0.32 tons per capita.

Up and to the right bigger population density and higher per capita consumption.

Now we're going to change and look at the level of per capita income.

You can see the great diversity of population densities and of per capita consumptions.

One, the red line, is the ratio of British to Indian per capita income.

But if you come back to a poorer country, where the GNP per capita is,

And yet manages to spend half of what the Unites States spends on health per capita.

Not really. The Gemenon ships use more water per capita than any other ships in the fleet.

Our real GDP is equal to our current dollar GDP.

The per capita consumption of rice of Japanese people is about half of what it was fifty years ago.

They're practically untouched, while America suffers the greatest number of causalities per capita of any country in the world.

Top left, we have Canada and Australia, with enormous land areas, very high per capita consumption 200 or 300 lightbulbs per person and very low population densities.

Let's say this is U.S. GDP, right? GDP is just output.

China still has large areas of underdevelopment and per capita income is a better measure of the sophistication of the economy.