One is quasi active,

In terms of equilibrium, there's 2 equilibrium points, the 9 9 and the 5 5.

It does an equilibrium glide. Highly controlled.

Equilibrium has been reached. Decompression is complete.

But it's being balanced like that in equilibrium.

Now, the third concept is the concept of equilibrium.

And know the distinction between a true independent variable and a quasi independent variable.

It's a revolution in that it's a change in equilibrium.

The equilibrium point defines a pure strategy for each player.

Quasars originally meant quasi stellar object, which means things that look a bit like stars.

The first is, the system has to be in non equilibrium.

But when you regain your equilibrium, I have a John Doe.

What I want you is find the equilibrium point for this game.

There will be one equilibrium point. I want you to find it.

So again just remember the, the difference between a true independent variable and a quasi independent variable.

You must figure the tumult suddenly striking on the unstable equilibrium of old

Are they ever in equilibrium in the way that you see your work?

He says, the problem with thermal equilibrium is that we can't live there.

Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops an equilibrium with the surrounding environment.

the right to direct private armies, to manage global affairs into stable equilibrium.

Now it's four apple cubes, and their behavior again moves towards the Nash equilibrium.

Economists talk about game theory, that every two person game has a Nash equilibrium.

And that equilibrium is not what the United States would like, but it's probably an equilibrium that the United States can live with, and that a lot of others can live with.

Cyril Hazard was one of the radio astronomers who obtained precise measurements of few quasi stellar sources and their positions.

Then tell me the outcome for the game for each player for that equilibrium point.

So Boltzmann says, look, you could start with a universe that was in thermal equilibrium.

dividing Guttermeg's principle of opposing forces in motion, and adjusting for the difference in equilibrium...

So when the fish control the urchin population, the ocean was restored to its natural equilibrium.

An additional twist is that all of the constructions in English are used not only literally, but in a quasi metaphorical way.

level. Morally, the reason this is happening is because of a perfect equilibrium between two competing forces.

It tends to be done, in the United States especially and most large countries, it's done by the Central Bank (it's done by the Central Bank) which is sometimes directly part of the government, sometimes it's quasi independent, in the U.S. it's a quasi, the U.S. Central Bank, which is the Federal Reserve is quasi independent, and in the future videos we will talk more about the governance structure of the Federal, of the Federal Reserve.

Similarly, for the politicians, click on the right box for their strategy, which leads to the equilibrium point.

An equilibrium is a mathematical state in which everybody has figured out exactly what everyone else will do.

We would not be able to process information, metabolize, walk and talk, if we lived in thermal equilibrium.

This is Niles Eldredge. He was the co developer with Stephen Jay Gould of the theory of punctuated equilibrium.

That leads us to this Nash equilibrium point, and the values of that outcome are 3 for each party.

And as you can see, their behavior moves up in the direction of this change in the Nash equilibrium.

Multiplying these two together, the final virialized state of structured equilibrium, would be 180 times denser than surrounding background.

So you have your Federal Reserve as the Central Bank in the United States, it's quasi independent, but it's been given the right to print money.

Finally, the third axis turns around and the, that's really cluster collapses along that. and it will become, again, a quasi spherical object in the end.

And like our relationship with the ecosystem we're always searching for equilibrium in how we divide ourselves across the planet.

From virial equilibrium that told him how much total mass there has to be in order to bind galaxies together.

Because picking a number that low is actually a bad choice if other people aren't doing equilibrium analysis as well.

When it's in the equilibrium state, the Virial theorem state, tells you kinetic energy will be 1 2 the potential .

And then, what population of the Earth would be an equilibrium that could continue on, and be for 2050, 2100, 2150?