Substrate

Substrate

Specificity?

There's no specificity there.

That's usually called the specificity.

How do we maximize the specificity?

That's the kind of specificity you need.

Mud and minerals become substrate there are bacteria.

In fact the nuclear catastrophe benefits from a nefarious though durable specificity benefits from a nefarious though durable specificity

Forgive me for wanting a little specificity, Eames.

It can be put down on any substrate whatsoever.

And I picked minimalist pieces because they're about specificity.

A 70 sensitivity and less than that for specificity

Because it's heterogeneous, and that's the perfect substrate for evolution within the cancer.

The idea goes like this imagine space is a substrate of all there is.

Would a prior probability of cancer of 1 , a sensitivity and specificity of 90 ,

Just to check suppose probability of cancer is 0.1, the sensitivity is 0.9, specificity is 0.8.

Pyriform silk glands make the attachment cement that's the silk that's used to adhere silk lines to a substrate.

And we'd also have a coffee shop, and the waste grains from that could be used as a substrate for growing mushrooms.

Now because the specificity first is negative, we have to do the same trick as before and multiply it with 1 0.8.

And so actually it allows for an intense emotional exchange, but is serves to absorb the specificity of the words that are delivered.

What we really said that we had a situation where the prior P(C), a test with a certain sensitivity (Pos_BAR_C), and a certain specificity (Neg_BAR_ C).

He ground it up and he managed to get out a couple of chemicals one, the enzyme, he called luciferase the substrate, he called luciferin after Lucifer the Lightbearer.

For those values, you should get a 1 3 and for those values over here, 0.01 as a prior 0.7 as sensitivity and 0.9 as specificity, you'll get 0.066 approximately.

But if you text now, or if you are someone who is aware of the substrate of texting the way it's become, you'll notice that LOL does not mean laughing out loud anymore.

You take p0 a prior times a probability of seeing a positive test result and divided by the sum of the same plus the expression for not having cancer, which is the inverse prior and the inverse of this specificity is shown over here.

So what we did is we collected some samples just as a way of testing from hospitals, trained rats on them and see if this works, and wonder, well, we can reach 89 percent sensitivity, 86 percent specificity using multiple rats in a row.

But the bug in our case was in touch sensitive displays we wanted to be able to draw you know, rub your finger across the screen to input continuous points and there was just too much friction created between your finger and the glass if glass was the substrate, which it usually is.

And what we're seeing is not just the potential death of the Eastern Hemlock species that is to say, its extinction from nature due to this invading parasite but we're also seeing the death of an incredibly complex ecosystem for which these trees are merely the substrate for the aerial labyrinth of the sky that exists in their crowns.

That's the substrate that we're exploiting today, whether it's the internet, genetic engineering, laser scanners, guided missiles, fiber optics, high definition television, sensing, remote sensing from space and the wonderful remote sensing photos that we see in 3D weaving, TV programs like Tracker, and Enterprise, CD rewrite drives, flatscreen, Alvin Ailey's Suite Otis, or Sarah Jones' Your Revolution Will Not

And the face of pharmacology is constantly changing. We can take individuals, we can administer drugs, we can measure the response to drugs, both good and bad, we cannot now try and understand how those drugs work but the specificity of our understanding is ever increasing. For example, we know that environment significantly changes an individual response to a drug, both in terms of its efficacy as well as its toxicity.