What does it do for companies?

When countries get together in places like Copenhagen, they shouldn't just discuss the CO2.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

I have a couple of ideas to begin with.

There's the audience in rhetorical arguments.

So we have these models argument as war, argument as proof and argument as performance.

Even if it's copyrighted?

hmmm, a matter of debate that is.

And finally this is really the worst thing arguments don't seem to get us anywhere they're dead ends.

Do you think the president is mad?

Once you go on that vacation, there's nothing left over.

Okay, there're lots of problems to worry about.

His argument is more radical than yours.

I don't understand what you're saying.

But with Africa, let's start being careful about this.

I think you've imagined a good arguer, an arguer that's worthy of the kind of arguer you should try to be.

Objection.Argumentative.

(Laughter)

And let me explain what I mean.

That is debatable and we will have that debate.

We still have many other things to discuss.

People are taking sides on the abortion issue.

Well, there are some other puzzles.

But obviously, there's a debate here.

That's not a very helpful model for arguing, but it's a pretty common and entrenched model for arguing.

Now, can you imagine an argument in which you are the arguer, but you're also in the audience, watching yourself argue?

And more than that,

This pro aging trance is what stops us from agitating about these things.

There's something more important we need to discuss.

The disaster is for that two billion.

We lack even a vocabulary to deal with this problem, and that's because we have the wrong frame of reference.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

His argument was aside from the point.

So, we'll talk a little bit about some operating system concerns and virtual machine concerns.

He just couldn't capture the picture. And so they were talking back and forth about this question.

They can indict your ass. They can debate it.

We should be able to do the job just from regular brightness images captured by an ordinary camera. We should not need a depth camera.

Every article on Wikipedia has a corresponding discussion page, and on the discussion page they had extensive argument among the Wikipedians as to whether to have his real name featured in the article.

Is intellectual property a fair system?

This is a case with no room for generalizations or arguments

And what that means is that I argue.

The number of children is not growing any longer in the world.

The first point to be discussed is whether segregation existed in this district.

Had something to discuss.

There's nothing to test.