I am aware that it was unanimous.

You know, the town voted unanimously, approved the water main, so...

His foolish proposal was approved unanimously.

And just a month ago, this was passed by the Icelandic parliament unanimously.

Then it's unanimous!

It was by no means unanimous but your proposal was selected.

In our case, the book value of the equity was 5 million.

So, I could write this

Here if we're looking for single letter strings that are between 0 and 9, the 1 matches, the plus does not, the 2 matches, the equals does not, the equals does not, and the 3 matches.

Over here we're looking for capital letters A through Z in Mir Dard 1721.

We all know that it's Bill.

(x gt a b).

We're looking for single letter strings, 0 through 9, in Mir Taqi 1723 nothing, nothing, yes, yes, yes, yes.

Everybody else says they have to give a password and it has to match the regular expression.

And that's over 20 hours of video every minute.

And if you view it that way, you can pick out that angle ABD is going to be congruent

It does seem a bit coincidental.

Yeah, okay.

They're going to press left or right.

Visual matching.

Over here, we have a 2 character sequence that's a backslash followed by a dot.

Mooji continues reading 'The one Reality is ever the same.

So of course they're gonna match.

So it checks whether x 0, whether y 0, whether z 0, and so on.

A hung jury.

If you call find_element, passing in as the list the list 1, 2, 3 and passing in as the value to match the number 3, we find the match here, which is position 2, so the output should be 2.

1 space 2b it is in the string, but we never have any letters in this regular expression.

Jesse, last time you seemed pretty down about your job at the Laundromat.

like a seeker finding someone in hide and seek, or right, right.

And if I'm running find all, I'd rather have it return the hyphenated word super irvin instead of first checking if the word matches just super, then seeing that hyphen doesn't match anything, and then returning irvin.

You've been seeing Stell behind my back.

Then, we all agree on not guilty ?

The story is consistent with the evidence.

No matter what they do They just still get through

This was much too low.

In fact, if we 0 through 9 next to 0 through 9, there are a huge number of strings that we would match 100 in total.

The answer would be in this case 40, because we pay a 20 penalty of a bad match over here.

No, that that's a coincidence.

Finally, over here we start with bold, and we have salvador dali again.

We split on the pipe. If a call makes a secure val on the value we pulled out of the string, if it matches that string itself, it's valid.

I agreed with him on that point.

That does not accord with his statement.

That doesn't agree with what he said.

The cost comes in two different flavors.

We agreed Not guilty .