The size of each tile is one square foot.

And the inequality will switch, because we are multiplying or dividing by a negative number.

This positive 17.17 will become a negative 17.17.

We just want to solve for mu.

The important thing you need to realize, though, when you do it with an inequality is that when you multiply or divide both sides of the equation by a negative number, you swap the inequality. you swap the inequality

Just subtract a 2 from both sides.

And yet, they're not.

It's only when you multiply by negatives that you swap the inequality.

Then you have an 8 times a negative 15.

We never should have given them the vote and legitimized their unholy existence.

But they aren't equal.

That's the equation of this line.

All of these things that I'm shading in green would satisfy the inequality.

(Laughter)

And we just calculated it at that value let me write it over here that 2.98 I'll write it right over here 2.98 over the square root of 10 is equal to 0.942.

In the inequalities, there's a whole set of x's that will satisfy this inequality.

Now it's 0.5 even worse than that in America showing us the income inequality.

So what we want to do is multiply this entire inequality by this value right over here.

Now, because I'm multiplying or dividing by a negative number here, I'm going to need to swap the inequality.

We live in a world that everyone knows is interdependent, but insufficient in three major ways.

Copied it.

Since we are dividing by a negative number

If this was any equality we'd be done.

Now we have the reverse tendency.

So we get vf squared is equal to 2 times the force divided by the mass times the distance.

What can you analyze with this pattern?

So if we want to solve for x, how many tiles can he buy?

We have nothing to complain of.

We have nothing to complain about.

We have no complaints.

I think that Japan's marriage system is an unequal and discriminatory contract disadvantageous to men.

radio The haves are getting more while the have nots are getting less.

Last week, Bill Clinton at the TED Awards said,

If this right here is b squared, if the 9 is b squared, right there, then that means that b is equal to 3.

Now what we want to know is what x values make this inequality true?

But I experienced a revelation... that I had been brought to this island to provide the commensurate social services that were sadly lacking for the poorer elements of society here.

And if I look at the choices, already it looks a little bit different than that, but we'll get to that.

So I'm going to move on.

When x approaches infinity, it's going to be approximately equal to the plus or minus square root of b squared over a squared x squared.

No medicine can cure a man of discontent.

You'll notice too from the syilabus that we don't only read these books, we also all take up contemporary political and legal controversies that raise philosophical questions.

So I think this will give you a visual intuition of what this quadratic inequality means.

Almost no overlap. And what has happened?

And you could try out any value less than 1 10 and verify that it will satisfy this inequality.

Because of the enviroment, products and services scarcity, because of inequality among people?