Thus, not, no relation to the beta, which is the standardized regression coefficient.

In other words, from an asymptotic standpoint, in this algorithm, we'll run the same worse case asymptotically then check both of the boxes.

When you listen to stereo on your home system, your both ears hear both speakers.

Now I'll give you a slightly more complicated choice between two payment options.

It would do a lot of good, but it's also very, very costly.

As we look at these trends, do we become despondent, or will we become energized?

We just talked about the case of y equals to 1.

In this case, we're done we locked out.

I wish I could be in both places at the same time.

Note that in the case of the cold dark matter, there's still some power even at very small masses.

And what's neat here is now we have two terms.

You make two assumptions, Ms. Dunham, both incorrect.

No, turn it on. I can do both.

Well let's see.

They both have one 2.

So if we look at our choices, only these two are opening downwards.

And it turns out we need to figure out what is the partial derivative of two cases for J equals 0 and for J equals 1 want to figure out what is this partial derivative for both the theta(0) case and the theta(1) case.

So one way to solve these systems of equations is to graph both lines, both equations, and then look at their intersection.

And if we do x plus 2 greater than 0, if we subtract 2 from both sides of that equation remember I'm doing this right now we get x is greater than minus 2.

Maybe I'll circle that one, I could have circled that one.

We're carrying three cases each.

I do the modal operation here just to make sure my angles are nicely between 0 and 2π.

It seems like with twiddle we're adjusting one parameter at a time.

Now it matters what order you do the operations in.

(Applause)

This case also applies to other cases.

Now, what is the only point that is sitting on both of these lines?

I need both.

Two marriage proposals, both with songs.

Hmmm... Yeah...

Ugh, I'm sorry, but the wheels of justice spin too slowly.

One name on both lists. Lee Skelling.

So whatever earnings Abby and Ben made, they have to satisfy both constraints or they have to sit on both of these lines.

I went in for the CAT scan.

So we have two mixed numbers here, and like when you're adding mixed numbers, you can do it two ways.

And which of these outcomes represent getting correct on both?

So we need to actually add a second base case.

Again dots there, rather than there, on a screen.

This is total probability as we already encountered it.

And now we're gonna do. We're going to do a single pass of the output array copying it in an increasing order.

In some cases it's even been possible to distinguish the murderer's face at the very moment he committed the crime.

Now there's two ways we can do this.

Both

Bottom

Show both