I think it's a hopeless goal.

I mean, it's just technology.

We sit you in straight rows just like they organize things in the factory.

Ethically, it's unthinkable.

They all came from people. People innovate.

Every system asserts its own coherence and cannot shift into another out of its own accord.

Theoretically, it's all quite possible.

I think about it in this really scientific way of measuring my impact, and this shows that it's possible.

You have set up a way of life that makes it impossible for you to have any human connection.

In the case of design, that means balancing desirability, what humans need, with technical feasibility, and economic viability.

Okay, so fine.

Diabetes I've just mentioned. Heart failure we already talked about. Hypertension

Well, you try to be impersonal about these things.

I mean, logically, it's impossible.

Surprise. Please, just listen to me.

And from that you have new possibilities for computing.

I'm not making this video to take either side to that argument, but it's a potential to turn to a human being.

It is impossible for me to harm, or allow to be harmed, a human being.

And he told me that, This can be won militarily, minister.

However, if successful, we believe humans can be stored indefinitely.

So I took the approach that the chair should do as much for them as humanly possible or as mechanistically possible so that they didn't have to fuss with it.

In a posterior view assess for the same.

Assess for asymmetry, muscular atrophy, or skin changes.

You want to measure the distance between the ASlS (anterior superior iliac spine) and the medial malleolus and compare the distance from one side to the other side.

Next observe the gait looking for an antalgic gait or excessive pronation or supination.

With the hand pronated, assess for asymmetry, muscular atrophy, or skin changes.

When did this happen?

Do you think there could maybe be others?

'Mankind is something to be surpassed.'

This leads to an important distinction in computer science between what's possible versus what's possible in a reasonable amount of time.

I define simplicity as a means to achieving clarity, transparency and empathy, building humanity into communications.

It's by gal stripping that tissue we humanize it (Laughter), and then we can put it back into a patient's knee.

This is in fact, a symptom.

technology holds infinite possibilities for mankind.

Now here at TED, over the last couple of days,

R68 Possible risk of irreversible effects

Okay, it might be obvious to some of you it wasn't to me.

That in the recycling work that I was doing,

So, what's it take to date the Human Torch?

Follow the active range of motion by checking resistive strength.

But really, it means excellence.

Last year, I told you the story, in seven minutes, of Project Orion, which was this very implausible technology that technically could have worked, but it had this one year political window where it could have happened.

Look for an antalgic gait or excessive pronation or supination.

It is almost physiologically impossible to be in a bad mood when you're wearing bright red pants.

It would have been a piece of cake for him to block and override our surveillance signal.