For those of you who have these conspiracy theories,

What am I appealing to you to step forward and drive?

Many of the technologies out there will not make it to the marketplace.

Because I've got Parker's research.

I've got Parker's research.

So, I can see that my 50,000 a year has been well spent.

Science is expanding.

Trixie. Section Research and Development.

I believe you have something for me as well. Parker's research.

He funded his research, and he took responsibility for the result of it.

How many masks do you need?

Now, the business model involves all of you.

Rnd, industry cofinancing, Prizes.

And the federal budget calls for a measly 20 million dollars of R amp D in geothermal energy.

Nowadays, people in the lab and people in other groups all over the world are using similar methods to activate or edit memories, whether that's old or new, positive or negative, all sorts of memories so that we can understand how memory works.

I was able to attract major research funding from the private sector and the federal government.

Here's an interesting one.

We're now at about 2.8 seconds.

Yeah, well, I would if I had that kinda grant money.

Allot the money for R D.

Now granted, many of those are white lies.

Then you've wasted 200 billion dollars in unnecessary tests.

If you work for a funding agency or pharmaceutical company,

Right now the Sloan Foundation has just funded a multi institutional study on this, to work out what the risk and benefits to society are, and the rules that scientific teams such as my own should be using in this area, and we're trying to set good examples as we go forward.

That still doesn't make sense.

Pharmaceutical research division.

Or people who drink old, stale, dead coffee!

But experts do get things wrong.

We're learning all the time.

You'd think, there's plenty of paralyzed people in the world, but the audience is too small, and the amount of research, the time it takes, the FDA clearances, the payback time is too long for V.C. to be interested.

I want that research.

They tend to sensationalize, and they lack context.

And we know, studies have shown that when you put resources in the hand of the woman in fact, there's an econometric study, the World Bank Review, done in 2000, showing that transfers into the hands of women result in healthier children, more for the household, more for the economy and all that.

I wanted to give it to the Institute of nonFerrous Metals, in case it's something new...

We have little money available for the research.

Sure, we invest plenty in innovation.

So, the question remains, why are we letting these fuckers have all the fun?

And it's really in this combined way that you get an overall sense of what's going on, because there's a lot of complex things

Exactly a year ago a formal study led by Dr. Jacqueline Clavel a formal study led by Dr. Jacqueline Clavel head of the enrironmental epidemiology of cancers department at INSERM head of the enrironmental epidemiology of cancers department at INSERM head of the enrironmental epidemiology of cancers department at INSERM pinpointed an excess of childhood leukemia cases around 19 French nuclear sites. around 19 French nuclear sites.

However, the inequalities that exist between richer countries and developing countries in terms of funding pose a real risk for exploitation, especially in the context of externally funded research.

Inside the compound, Master Naboo is safe from further contamination

I'll give you one very dramatic example of this a study that was done of investments in voluntary retirement plans.

What's the effect of that? One is a decline in order.

So we've got to figure out how they're living their lives.

I'll be in my lab.