But when you lower the Price to Earnings you are increasing the Earnings to Price.

Travel agencies' profits soared.

The company's profits soared.

We have this principal that we don't touch that produces returns, social, economic and ecological.

Over the same span of time sales have increased by two thirds and profits have doubled.

This new investment will multiply our profit.

We'll be able to make use of all that to evaporate more seawater and enhance the restorative benefits.

But the real problem is the lack of other infrastructures.

This is really important to pay attention to, because so many people say, oh, a company made this much.

But here you see it means very, very different things.

And at least it'll give you a sense of how revenues, gross profit, operating profit, pre tax income and net income really are different.

You use the distribution you get to sell more products.

Our interests clash with theirs.

Minus 500,000.

This is what the owners of the company get before they pay the government.

(Laughter) But I know it's the bottom line, or one's perception of it, that motivates people in the end.

Kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.

When the Golden Cat Corporation got rid of their 10 worst selling cat litter products, they saw an increase in profits by 87 percent a function of both increase in sales and lowering of costs.

A benefit to both our worlds.

I'll just abbreviate that as Nl.

Go ahead, eat.

And when people talk about earnings of a company, this is what they're talking about.

Thanks to a fundamental restructuring, our surplus has swelled three fold.

And that's my dad found that.

And that's what these brands did.

FDlC insured.

The rewards would be... enormous.

So you've probably heard not only the term earnings, you've probably also heard the term earnings per share.

They buy more of your service and they tell more of their friends, which leads to more profit.

And let's say, assume if I inherited this million dollars, I didn't finance it.

It's what Marianne LaFrance calls standing in social quicksand.

The reason this is happening boils down, in my mind, to one basic problem, which is our inability to perceive the difference between public benefits and private profits.

This is 350,000 of net income.

Why make this thing?

All the profits go toward Phillip's hospital bills.

It will be to our mutual benefit to carry out the plan.

The taxes will be 153,000.

I'm not a charity commissioner.

We are assuming a very simple world, were the is no taxes, we have no debt, we have no intrest or things

It's also important to think about what the benefit is.

So now look at the different lens.

Peter The greatest benefit to all.

Science comes first, but business comes a close fucking second.

It is to his advantage.

We're better off without the TPP