listen, refine something and go back.

Their focus is always about anticipated consequences.

So we're thrilled.

What that means is that you have to have a high performance or value for cost.

And that needs to be recognized, first of all, that peacekeeping works.

And the form has something to do with it.

What's your strongest type of sunscreen?

So we're building these buildings.

Fine. We don't want a lasting environmental impact.

What's your strongest type of headache pill?

Camfed pays girls' families to keep them in school.

That'll ensure the maximum number of casualties.

Narrator

The question is even if are there enough serious injuries to make these cost effective?

And not just by a little bit, but by a lot And, This is important because these, the hardware in these, those days was extremely expensive.

They're using it for the effects in the new dark man series.

But quite honestly, for a strictly theoretical exercise, the costbenefit ratio was just too high.

What are the most expensive resources you're going to need to pay for?

In doing so, we'll be removing a large part of our greatest carbon sink and replacing it with the most high greenhouse gas emission oil in the future.

In 2011, the US Veterans Administration spent about 5.5 billion on PTSD disability payments to approximately 275,000 veterans.

Saving the cost of fossil fuels Reduction of CO2

Image Effects...

The ultimate goal is that you prevent any of these things from happening.

More often than not it shows you exactly what you should do.

(Laughter) it's by far the most well documented example of the effectiveness of this kind of comedy.

Set here the level of the effect.

The effect to replace the list window when desktop effects are active.

And they did it in a total devotion to non violence.

That's going to be true or false.

The most effective defense is offense.

The expense is 10000 yen at lowest.

This value controls the level to use with the current effect.

It's not cheap either.

Definitely new softball jerseys, because we need them.

The sensor what's so cool about it is it is 168 times faster, over 26,000 times less expensive and over 400 times more sensitive than the current method of detection.

Especially when it's completely paid for?

The dimensionality reduction looks a little bit silly when you go from 2 dimensions to 1 dimension.

Now my question to you is, is this the most general solution?

One of the smartest people I've ever met.

He's actually pretty good.

But we still want to be sure that this is the most effective and safe device that we can be putting into hospitals.

The results are guaranteed and the costs are the same.

But what I got right here... it's better than anything your doctor gave you back in the States.

In the United States, North America, much more expensive.

It has wonderful effects, and sometimes strange effects.