So, we think we should treat them differently than we would want to be treated.

Really, it happened here in San Francisco to a famous chef.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is the rationale behind the existence of my armed forces.

This is what you need to remember.

In 1947 we merged these two things together in the Defense Department.

Based on what, Mark your spidey sense?

I am going to substantiate this theory.

What is the basis for the argument?

From the point of view of a public health nerd, junkies are doing dumb things.

in theory, yes.

And this might look all complicated to you right now, but I'm showing you the rationale.

Find you... between midnight and sunrise tomorrow, freedom for both of you.

And they're just using the real economy as kind of a sideshow or the rationale.

And interestingly, wearing a lap only seatbelt, 16.7 percent die.

They see us as rocking the boat, and you can understand why.

There is no scientific basis for these claims.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

What grounds do you have for your claims?

Yours is faith.

Based upon?

Why is that?

What would account for that?

It's not there?

You don't know what you're talking about,martin.

Theoretically.

They had no right to take that plant. Forget the plant.

Seems the logical assumption.

complexity is another word for this.

This is a mythical situation. How could I possibly know why?

It's about collecting empirical evidence.

Maybe he still will.

At least in theory.

The conclusion rests on a solid basis.

There is a logical explanation.

It's hardly an act of logic.

I want to make a case.

Mind you, I wouldn't bring it up if I thought the rumors would pass.

Let's look at this logically, OK?

Tell them it's a suicide.

And to whom?

How can you be sure?

What makes you say that?

How do you know that?

What makes you say that?

How do I know?