It was a two million dollar study.

It's not like if somehow I experience something, or at

Yours is faith.

in theory, yes.

Find you... between midnight and sunrise tomorrow, freedom for both of you.

It's always, as Karl Popper put it, theory laden.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

And interestingly, wearing a lap only seatbelt, 16.7 percent die.

There is a logical explanation.

It's hardly an act of logic.

Theoretically.

Tony learns about the ontologically promiscuous, the epistemologically anxious, the ethically dubious, the metaphysically ridiculous.

So I decided, what if you really did take the Bible literally?

This is going to be equal to 1.

Only theoretical records.

Seems the logical assumption.

So, everyone is also told, and this is true, everyone is a perfect logician.

Why do we value so much the election ?

If you wanted the time to triple, you'd use the natural logarithm of three.

Here, the strategy I explained,

At least in theory.

Logical, but unnecessary.

'The world' is objective,

You know what Gaia is, right? Theory of Gaia?

When you divide 19,500 by 30 with the calculator, this machine is to decide the result, not you.

Let's look at this logically, OK?

So you can imagine and this is what we are working on is from this knowledge map you have logic, you have computer programming, you have grammar, you have genetics, all based off of that core of, if you know this and that, now you're ready for this next concept.

So you can imagine and this is what we are working on from this knowledge map, you have logic, you have computer programming, you have grammar, you have genetics, all based off of that core of, if you know this and that, now you're ready for this next concept.

So, we think we should treat them differently than we would want to be treated.

theoretically.

Oky doky then. If there's any common sense in the design of the enemy's ship

So for magnitudes of the coefficient will be different.

It's not like they're mutually exclusive or anything.

I had totally lacked this heart in scientific pursuits.

Yes, you're right.

U.N. says it's a reduction with 1.8 percent.

There's a perfectly logical explanation for all this.

His argument is rational.

So this is the great paradigm.

Ethically, it's unthinkable.

Threats are illogical.

The cadet's logic is sound.

I don't know if I want to live in a world where knowledge is obsolete.

Well, it's something about the human mind, the problem with the human mind.

I don't understand the logic behind this transfer.