sciencey?

So we are a chemical scum that is different.

People are exchanging more methods.

We investigate claims of the paranormal, pseudo science, fringe groups and cults, and claims of all kinds between, science and pseudo science and non science and junk science, voodoo science, pathological science, bad science, non science, and plain old non sense.

This isn't very scientific.

You know, scientists and science is not creative.

A connection between personality and blood type has not been scientifically proven.

Observation is a passive science, experimentation an active science.

How can a sensible person in this day of modern technology be a Catholic?

Now, are we done? Have we written what we have here in scientific notation?

let's remember what it means to be in scientific notation.

Something Something scientific, right. What?

That's the humanitarian mission.

What?

Wow, wow!

From a strictly scientific point of view, history cannot be called a science.

But this is not quite official scientific notation.

Nye Now, um, space walks, launching Japanese modules, making scientific discoveries, that's routine.

And this is, obviously, not less than 10.

A structured wysiwyg scientific text editor

So that's the personal reason.

(Applause)

like they conduct electricity better than silver and copper, but also they just have these incredible properties.

Law says one thing, conscience says another.

That scholar made a great scientific discovery.

Physics is a fundamental natural science.

Physics is a fundamental natural science.

She wrote on gender bias in science.

It also shaped Darwin's scientific method, as well as that used by his peers.

Why do apples fall down?

And the goal of the program is to

Well, from the standpoint of science...

His methods are not scientific.

And I remember there sitting at my desk thinking,

Girls hate bugs, love hugs, and are better at vacuuming rugs.

Well, there's no science to suggest.

People always say consciousness is very hard to define.

This building is protected by a very secure system.

Prakash, in its five years of existence, it's had an impact in multiple areas, ranging from basic neuroscience plasticity and learning in the brain, to clinically relevant hypotheses like in autism, the development of autonomous machine vision systems, education of the undergraduate and graduate students, and most importantly in the alleviation of childhood blindness.

And at the heart of that economics, we're placing a more credible, more robust, and more realistic vision of what it means to be human.

Scientific research is not a mechanical routine, but a continuing struggle on the part of the scientist.

Here's a redletter date in the history of science.

Is there anything else you want me to look at?

This can't possibly be scientific.

That the scientific trespasses I've committed