So, if we plug in the numbers we know about, we get 0.009 over 0.009 0.198.

The probability of B is a sum over all probabilities of B conditional on A, lower caps a, times the probability of A equals lower caps a.

He was, to some degree, satisfied with the result.

And you see they have pretty similar death rates among young kids and old people.

To some extent I agree with you.

We doubled Y, so that's what it means when something varies directly

2 on a c goes nowhere.

There are no results to save the result list is empty.

Let's see. Let's do the third of the turn first, and then the sixth of a turn.

You can do, you know, display

If we scale X up by a certain amount, we are going to scale up Y by the same amount

(Applause)

That's a little easier to read.

And there are, there is another approach due to a group factor bond which also does in that range slightly better.

It's cool for me.

I repeated this over and over again, getting exactly the same results that we were.

This is absurd. They won't tell me anything different.

But there's a solution you build a toilet.

If I'm in 2 and I see a c, I fall off the world.

This 10 times 5 which is 50 and you would have gotten the same result.

I agree with you to some extent.

It's not really all that much data.

And then 9000 8000 is 1000.

I agree with what you say to some extent.

I told you last year, I'll tell you again, my mother was born in Egypt, and I who am I?

But the result will inevitably be the Same.

Your data looks at fatalities. It doesn't look at serious injury.

If you're If you're given a message amp amp you wanna apply this set of transformations to that message to get a digest that set of transformations should not take a long time to implement.

This is why politics is so tribal.

We could instead rotate 120 degrees counter clockwise and get the same answer, which would let us put a positive angle.

10 3 which is 7.

I'm on a par with him in mental faculties.

What's interesting about this experiment is that it's not an aberration.

What causes these changes?

People here played it safe.

This is just the parse state we started with previously.

All three of these methods are equivalent, and produce the same result.

When it hit that detector is dependent on the mass and the charge.

On this side, there's a different experience.

This is just the weight versus the age.

All you have to do is prove to the government it's worth a billion dollars.

And then when I flip it again I get 2 more come for the second one.

And this number truly has probability zero.

Here is the Kalman filter procedure.

We want our stuff to work too.