That this is the same thing as the log base 10 of 3, divided by the log base 10 of 7.

So, to some extents, it's tedious to compute these values, but they can be perfectly computed, as shown here.

This is a very short notation for squaring it.

We have some division going on here, and a multiplication there.

And the missing 1 5 shows up over here.

For the main diagonal elements you get the same formula as before.

And we're left with minus 5 minus 31 4.

Now, with a surprising increase in difficulty

Can you compute the distance of the moon from the earth?

So we should do these next, before we do this addition right there.

We try to evaluate what category that

Calculate simple sums

So the next thing we should do... There are no exponents. The next thing is multiplication.

They are not together.

Then you wanna do multiplication... multiplication and division, and then finally you do addition and subtraction.

That's just this first column, OK?

When we print out the first print, a is 2.

So you can actually kind of do them simultaneously.

What do i mean by that?

See I do this in real time.

So 3 goes into 42 14 times

Of course, if I advance too much I add 1 to the index.

I cannot calculate the final cost until I talk with our contractors.

Now, once we've invoked our multiplication algorithm recursively four times to compute these four relevant products.

Any computation I could carry out in Python I could also carry out in JavaScript.

So this right over here is the numerical expression that models the situation without any, without performing any operations.

So let's over here multiply 28 times 9.

But she had this great quote talking about no one believing that she could do such a thing, and they told her that computers could only do arithmetic.

He doesn't check his figures when he's calculating.

You could do the two plus three you could go from the right to the left you could go from the left to the right you could start some place in between if it's ONLY all addition and the same thing is true if you have ALL mutliplication if it's 1 times 5 , times 7, times 3, times 2 does not matter what order you are doing it in.

So we get n the number of vertices times nlogn for the total time to get the distance between all pairs of nodes.

Let's say this is what we assume is how many cupcakes we sell.

We calculate the value of this by multiplying the position of the digit by the value of the place.

As you look over here, what you find is that this is the best Gaussian describing the data points, and this is what EM will calculate.

We got minus 2 over 3.

And so, I'll multiply by 0.454 divided by 0.0254 squared.

Here's our formulas again from µ² and σ², and for the data sequence, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, give me the three statistics that we need to compute it in these boxes here.

You won't multiply by 4 divided by 2.

We just applied Bayes Rule to compute a really involved probability of having cancer after seeing a test result.

Because we can actually figure out every asteroid that's out there, and if it might hit Earth, and when it might hit Earth.

So this is going to be 7 plus and the 3 times 3 we want to do first.

leaving us with the total of 7 elements.

The inner loop of the summation now has only 3 terms rather than 5 terms.

So, the agreed upon order of operations is to do parentheses first.

I could actually put another round of parentheses right like that.