This one's fun.

They got along famously until the very end of the meal, and then they got into a furious argument.

like snapshot cameras, it fixates, it fixates, little (Snapshot sound) camera shots, and each time it fixates when you're moving forward, you get all this flowing outwards.

Adjust the microscope's focus.

Set the focus of the microscope.

Adjust the focus of the microscope.

We have a shared center we have a shared focus that car stays at the middle of all our relationships.

I focused the camera on her face.

Focus your camera on the flower.

That's an engineer gazing at tube number 36, trying to figure out why the memory's not in focus.

I thought it looked kind of a little bit like the Moon, which is sort of interesting.

Let's call this the rhetorical model, where you have to tailor your argument to the audience at hand.

So they're very closely related.

And focus most of all on this part of Africa just on the edge of the Sahara.

He had to focus the memory seems OK.

So, that's because the camera needs time to calculate the focus and exposure, but if you pre focus with a half press,

And what we want to do is, we want to find out the coordinates of the focal points.

And this is f2.

And it's for focus.

Let's take it right there.

Set here equivalent focal length assuming a 35mm film camera, in mm. A value of 0 means the focal length is unknown.

Now where is the car industry on that?

This is now flash forward to the point in time where I've been discharged by the health system.

And let's say I have some other point.

So what's the reality?

later turned into a monetary system.

Well, the first thing you do is though I've never well, we could just figure out the focal length just by plugging into the formula.

And as I look at the conversation, it strikes me that it's focused on exactly the right topic, and at the same time, it's missing the point entirely.

The distance of this point to the image plane up uppercase Z.

His argument is rational.

It elevates the temperature.

hmmm, a matter of debate that is.

That is debatable and we will have that debate.

We were arguing on different planes to the last.

And I am going to show you multiple applications in the medical field that can be enabled just by focusing, physically focusing.

Most Western intellectuals

You can't help but think that.

We're not going to put the brakes on in time to stop at 450, so we've got to accept we're going to do an overshoot, and the discussion as we go forward has to focus on how far the overshoot goes and what's the pathway back to 350.

I'll call that well, we'll call that a focus because it will be a focus.

I think that's possible, because there is a corner of the death penalty debate maybe the most important corner where everybody agrees, where the most ardent death penalty supporters and the most vociferous abolitionists are on exactly the same page.

We have focused on the worst case scenario.

I have a couple of ideas to begin with.

In this case the major axis is the vertical axis, so the focuses are going to sit here and here, and in this case, the focal lengths are going to be vertical down from the origin and vertical up from the origin, and we get, instead of it being a squared minus b squared, now since b is larger than a, the focal length, which is this, is going to be equal to b squared minus a squared.

Let's not argue for the sake of arguing.

Let's focus on the conversations between our friends and our family and our coworkers and our loved ones.