What was necessary to buy a house then?

I pay you to act.

I paid him the money due to him.

I paid fifty percent down for the car.

L'll pay for the horse.

And for that I will pay you 150,000... cash.

The fine shall be paid in cash.

So he actually has 100,000 of cash to buy his pizzeria, so he buys it outright.

And of course the difference is the money that he had to spend on tax.

It's just a deposit kind of thing.

I paid for the purchase in cash.

He paid the money on the spot.

I paid 1,000 yen on account.

Both elements in the parse tree that are involved in the transaction.

Because some of them have paid, and some of them are still paying.

I'd like to pay in cash.

I'd like to pay in cash.

But the point is, if it's a production tool, why do we have to worry about that?

I will make him pay the money.

Please pay the tax.

You're left with 500,000 of pre tax income.

If the ransom not paid...

That it did make sense, that the conventional wisdom that it is better to buy than rent held.

The consumer pays it all.

And they're going to get the money back for their loan.

I demanded that he should pay.

So you have accounts receivable of 400

What? The fella came in offering a full amount of cash.

Mr Experimenter, I solved X problems. Give me X tokens.

Let's say Pension Fund 1 were to lend 1 billion to A.

And then the people look in the mirror, and they say,

But she paid you

We had a nice, simple neighborhood in 1995.

A basic income points in the same direction.

Pay your fare here.

He demanded payment of the debt.

Can I pay you later? I need to run to the bank.

Just make sure we get paid.

I'd be happy to compensate you for your services.

Because the money he spends is the money that pays everything else.

You have no loan left over.

Some of which is interest, some of which is principle, but it's the same amount you're going to pay every month to pay down that loan plus interest.

And so it would essentially be I gave them 100 thousand maybe to do some work for me it would be a transfer of money by giving a loan and then keep forgiving over and over it would be completely identical to giving someone a gift, which is taxed, or giving someone some type of income

So zero coupon essentially means they're not paying interest until they pay off the whole loan.

Was the money actually paid?