An assumption and only an assumption.

And this is a huge assumption.

That's why this assumption is important.

That's a big assumption, and we could test whether or not that assumption is valid.

In answering how many people we actually need to poll, we made an assumption.

The other assumption that you made and this little lesson is to show you that you will make assumptions.

More data? Making the Markov assumption rather than naive Bayes assumption?

And this risk free is the big assumption.

The discount rate assumption is everything in finance.

I think six martinis is a reasonable assumption.

That's just an assumption.

It's all assumption driven.

We'll do other videos where we talk about when it is a good assumption, when it isn't a good assumption.

What about the second assumption?

This is under the assumption that there's no parallel arcs.

The financial system is built on the assumption of growth

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

Would it be helpful to make a Markov assumption rather than the naive Bayes assumption?

It's a reasonable assumption I think.

So this is the assumption that you get in on that.

This is a feasible goal, basically because, contrary to widespread assumption,

And the assumption is that they're related like cousins or whatever.

Beyond the assumption, actually 'I' is what, that's come apart? Q

Note that There is no assumption that one is stronger than the other.

Now this is a totally reasonable assumption, given that I have made quite a habit of encouraging people to spend more time playing games.

And so, Anuj and Acumen have been talking about testing the private sector, because the assumption that the aid establishment has made is that,

And let me make the assumption that our transition probability is deterministic.

She put on an assumption of ignorance.

What he said bears out my assumption.

And finally there's this assumption of homoskedasticity.

And most of them follow not except assumption. Indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all. Indeed, Allah is Knowing of what they do.

In this case, the problem really comes down to the naive Bayes assumption is a weak one, and the Markov assumption would do much better.

The basic law, let's say here's an assumption.

I'm not at all comfortable with that assumption.

They're making some assumption about the discount rates.

And they have thereof no knowledge. They follow not except assumption, and indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.

We can make the Markov assumption and that's the assumption that the effect of one variable on another will be local.

Or you could say the model is very, very, very sensitive to that assumption.

That's one of the reasons why making this naive Bayes assumption is so helpful.

And the assumption more or less is that small changes in p don't matter.

It's an assumption that modernity is a product simply of competition, markets and technology.

So we just took your assumption, divided by 12.

It's extremely unlikely given the assumption that everybody's healthy.

How would we detect a violation of that assumption?

And this challenges yet another assumption, which is that organized philanthropy is only for the very wealthy.