Confirming target.

An assumption and only an assumption.

Seems the logical assumption.

More data? Making the Markov assumption rather than naive Bayes assumption?

What about the second assumption?

I'm not confirming anything.

The assumption is something like this.

Would it be helpful to make a Markov assumption rather than the naive Bayes assumption?

That's just an assumption.

It's all assumption driven.

...Confirming that the blackout was a worldwide phenomenon.

The basic law, let's say here's an assumption.

They're making some assumption about the discount rates.

And this risk free is the big assumption.

The discount rate assumption is everything in finance.

We can make the Markov assumption and that's the assumption that the effect of one variable on another will be local.

Why, that would be confirming his guilt.

Our station chief in Rabat is confirming.

Confirming biometric pattern of Minuteman Ethan Shaw.

He's just confirming What he know Ducky.

Confirming secret service retreat in western quadrant.

That's a big assumption, and we could test whether or not that assumption is valid.

And this is a huge assumption.

It's a reasonable assumption I think.

That's why this assumption is important.

That's one hell of an assumption.

But that assumption was a problem.

Perhaps it was just an assumption.

The financial system is built on the assumption of growth

It's extremely unlikely given the assumption that everybody's healthy.

We need an assist in confirming visuals now.

And they have thereof no knowledge. They follow not except assumption, and indeed, assumption avails not against the truth at all.

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

She put on an assumption of ignorance.

What he said bears out my assumption.

And finally there's this assumption of homoskedasticity.

Next assumption and of course the events of July 7,

This is under the assumption that there's no parallel arcs.

In this case, the problem really comes down to the naive Bayes assumption is a weak one, and the Markov assumption would do much better.

Surely, he has brought the truth, confirming those who were sent before

Just confirming your 11 00 consult with Ms. Berenberg.

I'm just confirming that jim gulbrand's a member here.

So this is the assumption that you get in on that.

This brings me to the third, and perhaps most problematic, assumption

And the assumption is that they're related like cousins or whatever.