It's qualitatively different.

But when something like this happens, things are qualitatively changing.

You can also reason through the program qualitatively to get a handle on this.

Qualitatively and quantitatively, they choose exactly the same way as people, when tested in the same thing.

Better and better!

Oh, much better, much better, much better.

So we can qualitatively understand where they come from but their quantitative understanding, why they're so sharp is still a mystery.

But qualitatively, the density contrast, which is the difference between that line and the background line, grows as the universe expands.

They eat better they make love better they exercise better they work better they live better.

To me its just got better, better and better.

They all behave qualitatively in similar fashion, but the curves are separate. So this is what will lead us into cosmological tests.

It's getting better and better!

I feel better, much better.

Better.

Better?

Better?

Better?

Better?

Better?

Better?

Better?

Better?

Better.

Better.

Better.

Better?

Better?

Then growth gets better and better.

That's it. That's better. That's better.

Better than Jeff, better than anyone.

Drone better? Why is drone better?

We'll see an algorithm, there will be an obvious solution but, with some extra algorithmic ingenuity, by detecting subtle structure in the problem, we'll be able to do significantly qualitatively better than the naive or obvious solution to the problem.

The results just get better, and better.

Maybe it's better... It's better this way.

It just keeps getting better and better.

You deserve better, even better than me.

With a little bit of practice, they get better and better and better.

You deserve better from me. I can be better. I will be better.

That's better.

I'm better.

I'm better!

That's better.

Never better.

You'd better!

Better hurry.