Modalities and special faculties.

Deductive reasoning.

That's inductive reasoning.

A coward's reasoning.

And you often hear another type of reasoning, inductive reasoning.

There is no reasoning.

Same exact reasoning here.

Same exact reasoning here.

That is deductive reasoning.

When we are reasoning about a program, our reasoning follows these dependencies.

I'm on a par with him in mental faculties.

Also, 'My intellectual faculties was much more sharp before.'

So for example, spacial reasoning.

We believe that reason is the highest of the faculties.

They are interested in abstract reasoning.

There's an intuitive reasoning behind this.

Again, such dependencies guide our reasoning.

He wins his arguments by logical reasoning.

That's an example of consequentialist moral reasoning. consequentialist moral reasoning locates morality in the consequences of an act.

Prolonged exposure will lead to faintness, rapid degradation of your mental faculties.

I was completely taken aback by her reasoning.

We are not good at reasoning with uncertainty.

Now, this takes a little bit of reasoning.

She was one of those women who kind of numb a fellow's faculties.

Anybody who can live down in those sewers doesn't have all his faculties.

So we could think of adding on different, new sensory capacities and mental faculties.

Of course I remember. What do you think, I done lost all my faculties?

The same reasoning applies to the more complex problem.

They make errors of logic in reasoning with uncertainty.

This reasoning, this backwards reasoning is actually structured along the ways that earlier events in the program could have influenced later events.

I've tried reasoning with him but he just won't listen.

So, the line or reasoning would go something like this

It says, which of the following best describes deductive reasoning?

No, that's not really anything related to deductive reasoning either.

I'm not, Mr Lombard. I still have my reasoning powers.

I can at least help you to understand my reasoning.

It is physics. You know, the sort of first principles reasoning.

Male narrator Here's one more example of reasoning in propositional logic.

The most important concept when reasoning backwards is called data dependency.

It is precisely along these relationships that we structure our reasoning.

A ha! I mean, it really is a strange inversion of reasoning.

I call it an inevitable conclusion based on reprehensible process of reasoning.

If you won't see my line of reasoning, it's war between us.

Does their reasoning prompt them to this, or they are a people rebellious?

Or we decided to add this state based on reasoning about state 2.