Not simplistic extrapolation.

But that's simplistic.

But it's not simplistic.

These observations are simplistic.

This is far too simplistic.

I think that is too simplistic.

But it's very simple. It's very simplistic.

And so we have this terribly simplistic idea.

That might seem rather simplistic, but it's actually quite profound.

So, that's basically very simplistic technology of how this works.

But that's very simplistic, so let's go down and look at Tanzania.

Now it's really too simplistic to say that older people are happy.

So, this feed forward view of vision is regarded as rather simplistic these days.

When we talk about the brain, it is anything but unidimensional or simplistic or reductionistic.

And as we get farther and farther with our science, we get more and more into a discomforted zone, where we have to acknowledge that the simplistic categories we've had are probably overly simplistic.

A simplistic answer would be, the doctors are doing this because they want to protect themselves legally.

Well the best way to look at that is to do a tiny bit of simplistic statistics.

As you are undoubtedly gathering, the anomaly is systemic creating fluctuations in even the most simplistic equations.

And someone stood up to say that one of the frustrating things is that it's been a simplistic debate.

And we really have this incredibly simplistic view of why people work, and what the labor market looks like.

Our attempts at managing these systems are fragmented and simplistic, and not up to the challenges that we face today.

So, at a simplistic level, what a neuron is is a computational unit that gets a number of inputs through its input wires, does some computation.

So, the simplistic model that the image on a retina goes directly into our brain and there's a little movie screen inside of our brain or something.

Over the course of the day you are going to hear that when we talk about the brain it is anything but uni dimensional, or simplistic or reductionistic.

And the kind of simplistic solutions that we sometimes have, to think that doing everything by hand is going to be the solution, is really not morally justified.

So as you all recall, what our Founding Fathers were rejecting was a concept of monarchy, and the monarchy was basically based on a very simplistic concept of anatomy.

So, when the USDA finally acknowledged that it was plants, rather than animals, that made people healthy, they encouraged us, via their overly simplistic food pyramid, to eat five servings of fruits and vegetables a day, along with more carbs.

We are going to hear about some very simplistic notion, that will take our subjective experience and turn it into molecules, or maybe into some sort of very flat uni dimensional understanding of what it is to have depression or schizophrenia.

They were books telling a science fiction story through images and text, and most of the actors who are now starring in the movie adaptation, they were already involved in these books portraying characters into a sort of experimental, theatrical, simplistic way.

Because if enough people do it, we can change society's definition of success away from the moronically simplistic notion that the person with the most money when he dies wins, to a more thoughtful and balanced definition of what a life well lived looks like.

These things are weak intentionally, right, because you can always add power and control to a system, but it's very difficult to remove those things if you put them in at the beginning, and so being simple doesn't mean being simplistic, and being weak doesn't mean weakness.

In a sense, it actually makes you feel that when you're in the safe zone of studying behavior or cognition, something you can observe, that in a way feels more simplistic and reductionistic than trying to engage this very complex, mysterious organ that we're beginning to try to understand.

In a sense it actually makes you feel that when you are in a safe zone studying behavior and cognition, something you can observe, that in a way feels more simplistic and reductionistic than trying to engage this very complex and mysterious organ that we are beginning to try to understand.

And you have to look back and say again, you know, what's the best way to make this and how do you make something that could be really complex, very simplistic, because now we have the technology to do it and the design software is so easy. amp gt amp gt Right, right.

We're going to hear about a biochemical imbalance or we're going to hear about drugs or we're going to hear about some very simplistic notion that will take our subjective experience and turn it into molecules, or maybe into some sort of very flat, unidimensional understanding of what it is to have depression or schizophrenia.