So, remember in problem solving, we start off in a state, and it's a single state, not a belief state.

would not be a financial problem for the state with consumption tax.

But the problem is that that state has no relation whatsoever to this state.

We discussed that problem in terms of saying you're at one state, how can you change that state to get to a neighboring state?

Given a state space and a problem description, we can find a solution, a path to the goal.

So the planning problem is now the problem which relies on an action to each possible state.

In the route finding problem, the actions are dependent on the state.

The technique we looked at so far was problem solving search over a state space using techniques

In this problem, we're going to build a procedure that sees into the mind of a finite state machine.

A state isn't just an accepting state, it's an accepting state with a little label.

Observations alone can't introduce a new state a new world state into the belief state.

Narrator This is the belief state space for the sensor less vacuum problem.

Is it a maximizing state? It is a minimum state?

This process is an engineering problem, a mechanical problem, a logistical problem, an operational problem.

So this is China, a civilization state, rather than a nation state.

From a rainy state we have 2 outbound transitioning, 1 to a sunny state and 1 to a rainy state.

Think of a problem like solving a Sudoku problem.

The first problem was a conservation problem.

In case the problem reoccurs again, it goes into a state of reopened and then needs to be reassigned to a developer.

Given a particular state we look and see is it a terminal state?

Well, one of our edges is at state 1 on 'a.' State 1 on input 'a' goes to state 2.

Starting in a start state, on a b we transition to the middle state, on an a we end up in the third state, which is an accepting state.

Report a problem...

It's a problem.

That's a problem.

That's a problem.

It's a 3 dimensional state.

And then a belief state.

It can actually find a live state versus a dead state, which is awesome.

In state 1 on a 'q', you loop back to state 1.

The problem with this proposition is that the Chinese state enjoys more legitimacy and more authority amongst the Chinese than is true with any Western state.

Is it a hearing problem or is it a physicality problem?

Here's a problem, but look at that problem removed.

In our route finding problem, the initial state was the agent being in the city of Arad.

If all the information in the problem report is valid, then it goes into the new state.

Now, if we try to solve this problem with forward search, we'd start in the initial state.

There's no such thing as a problem. A problem is essentially a transition.

No problem, no problem, no problem, no problem...

State

State

State

State

State

State

State...