They're not statistically significant.

This is statistically significant.

Now this is statistically impossible.

Statistically, at least. Excuse me.

That's happening statistically right now.

Exactly what that means, statistically significant.

Statistically, one of you is a beetle.

This is Keith Haring looked at statistically.

You can claim that this is statistically significant.

Then we say, hey, this is statistically signifigant.

That's how you can prove it statistically, but what about stories?

And further evidence to support that conclusion is that the Sobel test was statistically significant so we can argue that the indirect effect is statistically significant.

Well statistically, the majority of those who join extremist organizations are highly educated.

Statistically, they are educated, on average, above the education levels of Western society.

What we want to look for are lines that statistically correlate with failure.

So statistically, you can do this for whole ensemble galaxies including inaudible survey.

General discussion now about NHST to fully appreciate what statistically significant really means.

inaudible That's critical to understand as you think about this idea of statistically significant.

less than.05 then you reject the null and you have statistically significant results.

Different because of different local, different resolution, different font size, or different speed.

And this works statistically, because these are models that we, we call, are, are nested.

I'm sure it's not based on scientific evidence but statistically this is very much possible.

What you could look for is features of the execution that statistically correlate with failure.

P is 0.04 so you can say, yes, it was statistically significant in this example.

Different, (Laughter) more different, (Laughter) still different.

So going from eleven percent to sixteen percent in this example is a statistically significant change.

They have different food, different culture, different art.

Statistically, what we'll do is, we will look at two variables that may be correlated, let's say.

I have shown that Swedish top students know statistically significantly less about the world than the chimpanzees.

I know statistically that no more than maybe 10 of them will come to the given days.

But you can assume statistically, and since this is a large number of borrowers it's 1,000, right?

We cannot take the information from past trials and put them together to form statistically significant samples.

Statistically speaking, there is no difference in how often the Neanderthal matches one African or the other.

Different people have different ideas.

Different strokes for different folks.

Different strokes for different folks.

looking different and being different.

Different neurons for different locations.

And different times, different generations.

And it had to recognize their different habits, different peoples, different religions, different faiths.

These are different wars, with different religious factions, different political factions, and different socioeconomic problems.

Different?

Different!

Different.

Different sectional units have different indentations