They're not statistically significant.

This is statistically significant.

These are robust algorithms.

They became more robust.

Delightfully tangy, yet robust.

Now this is statistically impossible.

Statistically, at least. Excuse me.

That's happening statistically right now.

He was far from robust.

But really, it's pretty robust.

Exactly what that means, statistically significant.

He is a robust young man.

15 years from the robust mouse.

It makes the brain inherently robust.

Statistically, one of you is a beetle.

This is Keith Haring looked at statistically.

A big man is not always robust.

And they are good, scientific, robust answers.

life is so resilient and robust scalability.

You can claim that this is statistically significant.

Then we say, hey, this is statistically signifigant.

But we had to make it fairly robust, much more robust than the robots we build in our labs.

It's a robust signature, and it's very stable.

So far from being robust, he was extremely weak.

So this also turns out to be extremely robust.

I'm going to call that robust human rejuvenation. OK.

I have a corresponding milestone to robust human rejuvenation.

I'm calling it robust mouse rejuvenation, not very imaginatively.

Well, the bad news is that these robust and robust is a key word emergent systems are very hard to understand in detail.

The technology was proving itself to be robust and scalable.

And we'll do this for practical, robust, real world applications.

It's very robust to anything you want to look at.

Why is almost every robust healthy boy with a robust healthy soul in him, at some time or other crazy to go to sea?

That's how you can prove it statistically, but what about stories?

And further evidence to support that conclusion is that the Sobel test was statistically significant so we can argue that the indirect effect is statistically significant.

And I'm telling you, this is very robust across English texts.

I needed tools that were robust, modular, highly efficient and optimized,

They all have their own type of frequency distribution, but it's robust.

And so now we can see, is that really a robust signature?

Well statistically, the majority of those who join extremist organizations are highly educated.

Statistically, they are educated, on average, above the education levels of Western society.

What we want to look for are lines that statistically correlate with failure.

So statistically, you can do this for whole ensemble galaxies including inaudible survey.

General discussion now about NHST to fully appreciate what statistically significant really means.

It will give you the same kind of robust architecture that I described.