We will exempt you from attending.

The goods are exempt from taxes.

He is exempt from the military service.

These articles are all exempt from duty.

Because in this system, machines are exempt from tax.

When he considers himself exempt.

Then why do ye not, If you are exempt from (future) account,

The sons of God who are exempt from college entrance by way of wealth!!

Donations to philanthropic programs are tax exempt.

She claims the inheritance.

His wealth and gains will not exempt him.

Then why do you not, if you are exempt from the reckoning and recompense (punishment, etc.)

Nor did We give them bodies that ate no food, nor were they exempt from death.

Here I've written four claims.

He claims he had instructions.

A farm worker! He claims he's He claims he's a doctor. ( tender theme playing )

Masaru claims that he is innocent.

He claims that he is honest.

And he claims basic web features

Here I've written down four claims.

He claims he knows nothing about her.

He claims that he is a painter.

To the orphan with claims of relationship,

Because none of us at least in the global North neither men nor women, are fully exempt from this message.

Tom claims he shot Mary in self defense.

Japan claims the Northern Territories for its own.

The boy claims he knows nothing about it.

There is no scientific basis for these claims.

Japan claims the Northern Territories for its own.

You refuse the claims of duty, honour, gratitude?

I've written four statements, four claims, that refer to that optimization okay phrasing or procedure from before.

I'm no misogynist, but were I so then I'd surely exempt you.

When you combine the science of recognizing deception with the art of looking, listening, you exempt yourself from collaborating in a lie.

Do you have any clear authority for such claims?

This job makes tremendous claims on our emotional strength.

Dr. Barricelli claims machine is wrong, code is right.

He claims it's done based on a UNESCO study.

Are you sure it's just the way she claims?

He claims to be a friend, but it not such.

Mac claims it's, uh, fit only for, uh, chemical warfare.

Because they allow us to make claims about causal mechanisms.

They come, they make their claims, they go. They're forgotten.

The secretary claims she was using it. Take the door.

Case dismissed without prejudice or refiling in small claims court.

That will allow us to make stronger claims about causality.