About 120 interventions have been proposed that allegedly make people happy.

long term studies of different interventions.

The more targeted our interventions, the better.

So those are examples of positive interventions.

It's not the only place we had any interventions.

Suppose you have 100 dollars to spend on various interventions.

And the third problem about the disease model is, in our rush to do something about people in trouble, in our rush to do something about repairing damage, it never occurred to us to develop interventions to make people happier, positive interventions.

And most often we can do two interventions, fix the meds mix.

There's all these different interventions but they have different kinds of effectiveness.

Potentially two billion people could have their food disrupted by such interventions.

Potentially 2 billion people could have their food disrupted by such interventions.

Now I'm going to show you what we get with various education interventions.

But beyond the staggering numbers, what's truly important from a global health point of view, what's truly worrying from a global health point of view, is that the vast majority of these affected individuals do not receive the care that we know can transform their lives, and remember, we do have robust evidence that a range of interventions, medicines, psychological interventions, and social interventions, can make a vast difference.

So when we think about scaling up metabolic materials, we can start thinking about ecological interventions

And we're going to be able to invent brain based interventions for children who have difficulty learning.

We found we could begin to look at interventions over the centuries, from the Buddha to Tony Robbins.

And the longer you could interact with one of these interventions, well that's indicative, potentially, of longer term success.

We need to unpack complex health care interventions into smaller components that can be more easily transferred to less trained individuals.

From the outset, we agreed that we had to have special interventions in place in order to bring the bottom up.

And yet, even in the best resourced countries, for example here in Europe, roughly 50 percent of affected people don't receive these interventions.

So the other thing I really like about this, besides the fact that it brings a whole new dimension into the study of control of disease, is that often the kinds of interventions that you want, that it indicates should be done, are the kinds of interventions that people want anyhow.

In a fight against speculators who are dumping the U.S. currency, central banks of major countries have carried out massive concerted interventions in the market.

If we could understand the structure of networks in villages, we could target to whom to give the interventions to foster these kinds of spreads.

Make haste! Make haste!

Make

Make

Make

Make

Men make houses, women make homes.

Men make houses, women make homes.

Make me laugh. Make me care.

Make haste, make haste, hurry down!

To explore that question, we did a study in the Boston area where we put one of three interventions in people's homes for a period of several weeks.

They make me present. They make me ready. They make me strong.

To make it connect. To make it make people want to act.

When teachers make it, children make it.

And it struck me that if you could train ordinary people to deliver such complex health care interventions, then perhaps they could also do the same with mental health care.

Now the same insights can also be exploited with respect to networks can also be exploited in other ways, for example, in the use of targeting specific people for interventions.

And I believe there are three different and I call them different because different interventions build them, it's possible to have one rather than the other three different happy lives.

Make hay!

Make bookmarks

Make Available

Run make

Make Clean

Make Results