Should Shareholders Be Kings?

Shareholders voted to liquidate the company's assets.

Well, ownership gives voting rights to shareholders.

That's what the shareholders own.

So that's what the shareholders want.

So we'll all be equal shareholders.

It could be debt, it could be payables they have to pay some other vendors.

We offer 32 shareholders exclusive breeding rights.

Shareholders are going to go after the rest of Frobisher's fortune.

How will this affect the next shareholders' meeting?

So they're all just shareholders in the company.

I don't dividend it out to the shareholders. I just keep that.

And the broker really owes it to one of the shareholders of

Shareholders were concerned about the company's swift expansion overseas.

I'm not selling laptops. OK? I have no shareholders.

That's good for the actual shareholders of the company.

Uh,we were wondering about one of frobisher's shareholders.

They have investors, they have shareholders. Shit like that.

If we start dividending out things to the shareholders, then you'll get that.

So the old shareholders of the company are wiped out.

It says every one of our shareholders should get 5.00.

But there's one thing that shareholders hate more than bad press.

And essentially, the debt holders become the new shareholders of the company.

In the next step, we built the network around these companies, so we took all the TNCs' shareholders, and the shareholders' shareholders, etc., all the way upstream, and we did the same downstream, and ended up with a network containing 600,000 nodes and one million links.

The board of directors of a firm is essentially elected by the shareholders.

Your boss works for the CEO and the CEO works for the shareholders.

This is the new shares of the company will be given to the old shareholders of the company.

Now Coke has a very clear bottom line they report to a set of shareholders, they have to turn a profit.

The only negative of that will be that the current shareholders lose all their money.

And in this case, if it's a publicly traded company, what is its shareholders' equity?

Or if there was a bunch of people pitching together, it would be called shareholders' equity.

Well, it turns out that the 737 top shareholders have the potential to collectively control 80 percent of the TNCs' value.

You'll be a member of a democratically controlled investment opportunity who's primary role, after return to investors, shareholders, members, is returned to the community.

Well the shareholders lost. Because before, there was only 500 million shares that split up the equity.

Your honor,it's a clear indication that gregory malina was a functionary in arthur frobisher's conspiracy to defraud his employees and shareholders.

But maybe the shareholders say, oh no that's really worth a million dollars or something, I don't know.

The only reason why I would say it's still not a great idea is, you're diluting the shareholders.

If Ginger and Fred don't hit a homerun at the shareholders' presentation we might not even have that.

so by a few months, or a few weeks, or whatever so they owe those vendors some money so they both have 5 thousand dollars in accounts payables

Well that means the people who own a stake in the company, or the shareholders, they share this piece.

And the market cap of the company is really what's the market's guess of what the shareholders' equity is?

If it wasn't just me, if there was 10 shareholders, each of us would have 1 10 of this.

And if you're a publicly traded company, actually you don't have to be publicly traded, but if you're a corporation, that's called your shareholders' equity.

liabilities there and liabilities over here now, they both have the same amount of accounts payables maybe the people they are buying shoes from are able to delay paying those shoes just a little bit

This is kind of the first modern corporation with shareholders and organizations that kind of if you squinted looked like something closed to modern companies today.