In 1950, Turkey had the first free and fair elections, which ended the more autocratic secular regime, which was the beginning of Turkey.

Here is the regime. You think you can topple the regime?

The secular world is full of holes.

We lived under apartheid regime.

So this regime on the

But, of course, our secular religion is technology.

Think of it as a kind of secular church.

His regime is bound to collapse.

You want to topple the regime?

But the secular minded people can be influenced by that.

There are secular kooks there are smart kooks, dumb kooks.

The obsolete regime is about to collapse.

So it was under Louis 18th's regime.

We aren't a simple authoritarian regime anymore.

So the setting of a cross validation error being high corresponds to either this regime or this regime.

Now education is a field the secular world really believes in.

Moreover, we know the Assad regime was responsible.

And the war ended with a regime change,

Those were the achievements of our great regime.

But did the regime learn anything? Not really.

How secure is the theocratic regime in Iran?

The rebel concealed his ambition to destroy the regime.

All political dissidents were purged under the former regime.

But then what was the answer of the regime?

The regime is shaking its fist at the world.

Then they fired rockets from a regime controlled area into 11 neighborhoods that the regime has been trying to wipe clear of opposition forces.

Now art is something that in the secular world, we think very highly of.

But compassion is also equally at home in the secular as in the religious.

Whereas here on the left, this is the high variance regime.

Whereas in contrast, this regime corresponds to a high variance problem.

We, Hazaran, as minority group suffered persecution by the Taliban regime.

What's the difference between a sermon and our modern, secular mode of delivery, the lecture?

In the secular world we think, If an idea is important, I'll bump into it.

On the one hand was my mother, a well educated, secular, modern, westernized, Turkish woman.

It's quite complicated to explain, but according to which regime I was,

A landscape bleak beyond words and a regime apparently marching toward armageddon.

Or a regime afraid for its own survival playing a shadow game?

Instead of which, we've allowed ourselves to be tempted towards regime change.

Flaunting and exposing this regime is a duty and makes me proud

All the other TEDs and I went to them all, under Ricky's regime

So in this large regime, the gulf between the two algorithms is growing.

The second largest group, with nearly 30 million, is the one described as non religious or secular.

This secular non religious vote, if properly mobilized, is nine times as numerous as the Jewish vote.

I would say that there are many, many gaps in secular life and these can be plugged.

And that regime that we got rid of was actually a dictatorship, an authoritarian regime, that for decades created a great sense of paralysis within the nation, within the people themselves.