So this is the assumption that you get in on that.

An assumption and only an assumption.

And this is a huge assumption.

That's why this assumption is important.

The assumption is something like this.

She put on an assumption of ignorance.

And finally there's this assumption of homoskedasticity.

And this risk free is the big assumption.

More data? Making the Markov assumption rather than naive Bayes assumption?

The financial system is built on the assumption of growth

That's just an assumption.

It's all assumption driven.

Seems the logical assumption.

We can make the Markov assumption and that's the assumption that the effect of one variable on another will be local.

This is under the assumption that there's no parallel arcs.

Let's test this assumption by heading over to Eastern Europe.

What about the second assumption?

Because we'll see later in this video that to some degree, that assumption is one of the biggest drivers of assumption.

This is a feasible goal, basically because, contrary to widespread assumption,

This brings me to the third, and perhaps most problematic, assumption

That's a big assumption, and we could test whether or not that assumption is valid.

Would it be helpful to make a Markov assumption rather than the naive Bayes assumption?

It's a reasonable assumption I think.

That's one hell of an assumption.

But that assumption was a problem.

Perhaps it was just an assumption.

Well, we'll just have to act on the assumption that he doesn't know.

Go ahead and make the distinct assumption for simplicity from here on out.

Using this assumption, he was able to explain some properties of light.

I'm only going on the assumption that we can get our money in first.

Suburbia, and many communities were designed on the assumption of plentiful oil and energy.

In this case, the problem really comes down to the naive Bayes assumption is a weak one, and the Markov assumption would do much better.

What he said bears out my assumption.

And it depends on this assumption of homoscedasticity Last thing I wanna do in this lecture is talk about the reliability of a correlation.

But the big learning from this is how dependent the present value of future payments are on your discount rate assumption.

That's one of the reasons why making this naive Bayes assumption is so helpful.

There's another tradition that thinks it's opposed to this but accepts the worst assumption.

The second assumption which informs the American view of choice goes something like this.

The basic law, let's say here's an assumption.

I'm not at all comfortable with that assumption.

They're making some assumption about the discount rates.

The discount rate assumption is everything in finance.

I think six martinis is a reasonable assumption.

That's a hell of an assumption to make...

And what this assumption drives is, well, there's going to be some inflation on things like housing association dues, annual maintenance, insurance.